Case Summary
Abdul Khadar filed a petition seeking eviction of rented rooms from the respondent in order to start a Super Market and Home Appliance business. The respondent failed to vacate the premises even after receiving a lawyer notice, leading to the court order for eviction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order for vacant possession of the shop rooms
Case Type
Eviction under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent) Control Act, 1965
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result petition is allowed as follows. I. Directing the respondent herein to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop rooms to the petitioner within three months from the date of this order under 11(3) of the Act.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Abdul Khadar (Age not specified years)
Pulikkalakath Pareekkutty Haji, Seenmanzil, Naduvilangadi, Post S Pookkayil
Defendants
Theyyambattil Sharafudheen (Age not specified years)
Kalpakancheri amsom, Paravannoor desom, Post Kalpakancheri
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Vacant possession of the shop rooms
Evidence:
In the result petition is allowed as follows. I. Directing the respondent herein to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop rooms to the petitioner within three months from the date of this order under 11(3) of the Act.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Rent Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the rental agreement dates for the shop rooms
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice demanding vacant possession of the shop rooms
Reference:
Ext.A2