Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Restoration Petition 2383/2016

Case between Madhu vs Preethikumari et al regarding Restoration Petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-03-27
Duration
0 years 4 months 10 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Madhu filed a restoration petition which was dismissed for default due to absence of the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The restoration petition filed by Madhu was dismissed due to his absence and lack of instructions from the client.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the restoration petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Madhu (51 years) Karukayil house, Purathoor amsom desom, Padinharekara, 676 562

Defendants

Preethikumari (36 years) Purathoor amsom and Villege, Padinharakara desom and Post. Prabhakaran (43 years) Purathoor amsom and Villege, Padinharakara desom and Post

Reliefs

Relief Type: Dismissal
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Dismissal of the restoration petition
Evidence:
It is submitted that petitioner has no instruction from his client. Name of the petitioner called, absent. Hence RPIA is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Sat, 11/19/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases