Case Summary
Ayisha filed a suit seeking eviction against Yahu, but the suit was dismissed due to absence of representation by Ayisha.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Eviction Case
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for eviction. It is submitted by the counsel for the plaintiff that he has no instructions from his client. Name of the plaintiff called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Ayisha (47 years)
Post Karippol, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Yahu (75 years)
Post Karippole, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Ayisha seeking eviction against Yahu
Evidence:
Suit for eviction. It is submitted by the counsel for the plaintiff that he has no instructions from his client. Name of the plaintiff called absent. No representation.