Case Summary
Chandran filed a suit against Sasidharan for recovery of Rs. 2,00,000 based on a promissory note. Sasidharan denied borrowing the amount and claimed it was security for a chit fund subscription.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Recovery of Money
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to provide clear evidence of the loan and could not establish a consistent source of income for the borrowed amount.
The plaintiff failed to provide clear evidence of the loan and could not establish a consistent source of income for the borrowed amount.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Chandran (59 years)
Puthuppalli Amsom and Post, Thrithallur Desom, PIN 676 102, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Sasidharan (50 years)
Purathoor Amsom, Desom and Post, PIN 676 102, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Unknown
Description:
Unknown
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Pro-note
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the loan agreement
Reference:
Ext.A1