Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 80 OF 2014

Case between Jamal Moideen et al vs Muhammed regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V., B.A, LL.B.
Order Date
2016-12-21
Duration
2 years 11 months 29 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The suit involves a partition dispute over a property purchased jointly by the plaintiff and the defendant, where the plaintiff seeks allocation of his share and share of profits from the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit and passed a preliminary decree for partition, dividing the property into 4 equal shares with the plaintiffs receiving 1 share and the defendant receiving 3 shares.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs provided cogent and reliable evidence supporting their claim for partition and share of profits.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore, I hold a view that the plaintiffs have proved their case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence and they are entitled for a decree as prayed for.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jamal Moideen (Age not specified years) Irimbiliyam Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk Sainaba (45 years) Irimbiliyam Amsom, Desom, Tirur Taluk Russal (29 years) Irimbiliyam Amsom, Desom, Tirur Taluk Fazal (23 years) Irimbiliyam Amsom, Desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Muhammed (57 years) Irimbiliyam Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Division of the property into 4 equal shares with plaintiffs receiving 1 share and defendant receiving 3 shares
Evidence:
Therefore, I hold a view that the plaintiffs have proved their case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence and they are entitled for a decree as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved the ownership of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Proved the defendant's claim regarding the property purchase.
Reference:
B1
Document Type: Joint Release Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Supporting the defendant's assertion of ownership.
Reference:
B2
Document Type: KSEB Bill
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Presented as evidence during the proceedings.
Reference:
B3

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases