Case Summary
Plaintiff sought a perpetual injunction to prevent defendants from encroaching on plaintiff's property and obstructing the path on the eastern side.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved ownership of the property and exclusive right over it through oral evidence and documents.
The plaintiff proved ownership of the property and exclusive right over it through oral evidence and documents.
Judgment Evidence:
The plaintiff has proved his case by oral evidence and document produced in this case. So the plaintiff is entitled for a decree as prayed for.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Mammed Kutty @ Ahammed Kutty (67 years)
Omachappuzha amsom, desom and Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 320
Defendants
Saithalavi (65 years)
Nannatt veedu, Ozhur amsom, Perincheri desom, Post Omachappuzha, Pin: 676 320
Yoonass (35 years)
Nannatt veedu, Ozhur amsom, Perincheri desom, Post Omachappuzha, Pin: 676 320
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Perpetual Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Injunction granted to prevent defendants from encroaching on plaintiff's property and obstructing the path.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has proved his case by oral evidence and document produced in this case. So the plaintiff is entitled for a decree as prayed for.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
No. 1097/1977
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented proof related to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
14-01-2016
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Report confirming the details of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
15-06-2016