| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4231 - 4235 of 21981

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s. The south Indian Bank Ltd. vs M/s. Galaxy Zoom India P.Ltd. regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 97/2022

Ernakulam

2024-06-18

approximately-1 year 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Durocoat Paints Pvt Ltd. vs Sapna Cherian @ Swapna Cherian regarding Realization Of Money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.497/2021

Ernakulam

2024-06-18

approximately-3 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vidyarthadayini Sabha et al vs Deepa Sojan et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1007 /20 23

Ernakulam

2024-06-19

approximately-5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between United Timber Corporation, Sri. Muhammed K Naushad vs Nidhi Wood Industries, Sunaja Sarojini regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1360/2017

Ernakulam

2024-06-20

approximately-6 years 0 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Shameem Kharim vs Sudishkumar.M.S regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 317/2023

Ernakulam

2024-06-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9683

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Petition was dismissed for the plaintiff's failure to pay necessary fees for processing their case.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff failed to provide adequate evidence supporting claims or proving the means to pay a decree.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Dismissals occurred due to the plaintiff's failure to issue required notices to respondents.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Plaintiff's absence from court proceedings led to the dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?