| Niyamam AI

Displaying 376 - 380 of 21815

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between G. Gopakumar vs Nijad Nissam regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No.629/2024

Kollam

2025-08-26

approximately-1 year 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajeev Gopalakrishnan vs Shiyad Salam regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 652/2024

Kollam

2025-08-26

approximately-3 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aneesh vs Dileep et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 654/2024

Kollam

2025-08-26

approximately-2 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajan Edward vs Anupama regarding injunction

Civil Suit

OS 346/2024

Kollam

2025-08-26

approximately-1 year 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Max Oriyon et al vs V-ONE Plaza et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 39/2021

Kollam

2025-08-26

approximately-6 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9607

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary batta fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to prove claims resulted in plaintiffs' failures in multiple cases.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Many plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?