| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3606 - 3610 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s A.R.G Apparels regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.553/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-06

approximately-2 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Krishna Kumar vs Vivek.M regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.83/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-07

approximately-4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mubarak vs Soman regarding vacating ad interim injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No.1819/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-08

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shajahan vs Muhammed Nazar regarding amendment of pleadings

Civil Suit

OS.No.414/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-08

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Rajesh Kumar.G regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS.No.1379/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-09

approximately-1 year 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of Evidence

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove defendants' means.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Cases were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to take action such as issuing notices.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Presentation of Necessary Documents

The lack of required documentation resulted in case dismissals for plaintiffs.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Non-Presentation of Necessary Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?