| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3306 - 3310 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vinu Chandrasekharan et al vs Sudheesh S.G. et al regarding recovery of money and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No.1905/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-13

approximately-8 years 11 months

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between The Federal Bank vs Praveen Manohar regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS.No.1275/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-13

approximately-4 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between A.M.Shanavas vs A.Nizarudeen, Venugopal Nair regarding temporary injunction.

Injunction

OS.1026/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Madanlal.T.R et al vs SFS Carlton Owners’ Association et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS.No.265/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-13

approximately-2 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Rajesh. J et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1451/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-06-16

approximately-5 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissal for default across multiple cases.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to demonstrate the respondent's ability to pay the decree debt resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiff's inaction in notifying parties or moving the case forward led to dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs not appearing in court as required.

Found in 11 cases (11%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?