| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3096 - 3100 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ambili. K vs Gracy regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.797/2017

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-09-29

approximately-8 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Radhika.B.R. vs Beena Moli et al regarding an ad-interim injunction

Injunction

O.S. No.1603/2025

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-09-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rehiyanathu Beevi @ Raheena vs Beena.R.V et al regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.286/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-09-29

approximately-2 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Dr. Suraj Soman vs Mr.Jayakrishnan regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1333/2025

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-09-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sri. Rajesh. R regarding Suit for realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.624/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-09-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to present sufficient evidence to support claims resulted in dismissals.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Inaction on Issuing Notices

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary steps to issue required notices, causing default.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners

Inaction on Issuing Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?