| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2911 - 2915 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between P.Surendran vs T.Ajith Kumar regarding declaration of title, ownership and possession of property

Civil Suit

OS.No.513/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-11-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Biju.S.Nair vs Sasi Kumar regarding status quo maintenance.

OS.No. 54/2020

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-25

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S ARS Colour Care regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No.198/2025

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-11-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Arundhathi JLG et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1325/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-26

approximately-8 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Principal Agricultural Officer vs R.K.Sasiharan regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1391/2020

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-26

approximately-5 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required court fees or charges, leading to dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff or petitioner during hearings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs often could not provide necessary evidence to support their claims or assertions.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Dismissing cases frequently stemmed from the plaintiffs not issuing required notices to involved parties.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?