| Niyamam AI

Displaying 19371 - 19375 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No: 166/2017

TIRUR

2019-11-15

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Unknown

S.T. No: 174/2017

2019-11-15

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding offense under U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST No: 183/2017

TIRUR

2019-11-15

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Ali.K. et al regarding Loan closure and satisfaction

Unknown

EP 200/2019

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-11-14

0 years, 5 months, 8 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Lmited vs Siddq et al regarding Decree

Unknown

EP 250/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-11-14

1 years 11 months 15 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claims or prove the means of respondents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to pay necessary fees and costs, leading to defaults.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Many petitions were dismissed as plaintiffs did not appear for court proceedings at critical times.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking steps to issue necessary notices to respondents.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?