| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1896 - 1900 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Raman vs Thanka et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 592/2021

Kozhikode

2025-11-15

approximately-4 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K. P. Jagatheesh vs Mujeeb et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 260/2015

Kozhikode

2025-11-18

approximately-10 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Premjo.N.J vs Riyas.K.P regarding return of money

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 797/2024

Kozhikode

2025-11-19

approximately-1 year 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Reetha vs Bindu N. M et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 515/2023

Kozhikode

2025-11-19

approximately-18 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pathumma et al vs Beeran Kutti et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 567/2019

Kozhikode

2025-11-20

approximately-6 years 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

45%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Necessary Documents

Plaintiff did not produce required documents to support their claims or maintain the petition.

Found in 45 cases (45%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Petitioners failed to pay necessary fees (batta), resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's non-appearance in court during hearings.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence for Claims

Plaintiffs could not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims against the defendant.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Necessary Documents

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence for Claims

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?