| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18266 - 18270 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Devaki et al vs Panchali et al regarding Partition.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 139 OF 2015

2019-06-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Abdul Azeez panchili et al regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

KLML130008742018

Malappuram

2019-06-12

0 years, 6 months, 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leelavathi et al vs Thilakavathi regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 82/2019

Malappuram

2019-06-10

0 years, 3 months, 25 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Sajid Poomaddathil et al regarding full satisfaction recorded.

Execution Petition

EP 313/2018

Malappuram

2019-06-12

0 years, 6 months, 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leela vs Leelavathi et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 90/2019

Malappuram

2019-06-10

0 years, 3 months, 25 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Court Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, resulting in dismissal for default.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take required procedural steps, such as issuing notices, causing case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Frequent absence of plaintiffs during proceedings resulted in automatic case dismissals for non-appearance.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Court Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?