| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1426 - 1430 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Integrated Finance Company vs M.K. Chellappan et al regarding restoration petition.

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petitiion 89/2024

Kottayam

2025-01-09

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Mathew Thomas vs Jince Joy et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

O.S. 498/2024

Kottayam

2025-01-09

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jibu Mathew vs Aliyamma Thomas regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 618/2022

Kottayam District, Kerala

2026-01-31

approximately-3 years 3 months 1 day

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Mathew Skariah et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.199/2024

Kottayam

2025-01-10

approximately-6 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of India vs M/s. Sreelakshmi Kudumbasree et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.605/2023

Kottayam

2025-01-10

approximately-1 year 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required notification fees or batta, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidentiary Support

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of Representation in Court

The failure to appear in court or have legal representation led to multiple case dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidentiary Support

Absence of Representation in Court

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?