| Niyamam AI

Displaying 871 - 875 of 21884

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Aruna D. Pillai et al vs Pradeep Kumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S 36/2019

Kanjirappally

2025-06-30

approximately-6 years 25 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shajahan vs Abdul Azees regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S 117/2019

Kanjirappally

2025-06-30

approximately-6 years 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.S. Chandralekha vs Vijayachandran Nair et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S 157/2021

Kanjirappally

2025-06-30

approximately-4 years 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between T.M. Raju vs Salim regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

E.P 37/2016 in O.S 338/2012

Kanjirappally Taluk

2025-03-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Suresh vs Muhammed Shaji et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S 142/2020

Kanjirappally

2025-08-27

approximately-5 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9640

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay batta, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Absence of sufficient evidence to prove claims or the means of respondents contributed to dismissals.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking required procedural steps, like issuing notices.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

The absence of plaintiffs in court proceedings often resulted in default judgments against them.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?