| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3451 - 3455 of 22030

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between State Bank of India vs Rajan V.L regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1481/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-04-08

approximately-6 years 1 month 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sujatha et al vs Vijayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1502/2017

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-04-08

approximately-1 year 10 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nujuma vs Shibu. K regarding injunction

Injunction

OS. No.695/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-04-08

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Madhusoodanan Nair vs Syama et al regarding an ad-interim injunction

Injunction

OS.No.702/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-04-08

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sobhana.S vs Sreenath regarding temporary injunction and easement rights.

Civil Suit

OS. No.230/2025

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-04-08

approximately-5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9707

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

16%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta for processing, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove defendants' means.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs often did not issue necessary notices to respondents, resulting in cases being dismissed.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

The absence of the petitioner during hearings was a common reason for dismissal of cases.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Absence of Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?