| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3421 - 3425 of 22012

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between C.Gopalakrishnan Nair et al vs Rekha Sreejith regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Injunction

O.S. No. 952/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-05-26

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Innocent Gomez vs Mary Merina S et al regarding temporary injunction

Injunction

OS.No.906/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-05-26

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Althaf. S.M vs Seneena et al regarding mediation agreement

Civil Suit

O.S.No.1731/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-05-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chandrika et al vs Sindhu.S et al regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession

Civil Suit

OS.No.1407.2021

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-05-28

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sajikumar vs Ramani et al regarding injunction application.

Injunction

OS.917/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9697

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary court fees or batta, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims or demonstrate the respondent's means.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Withdrawal or absence of the plaintiff resulted in automatic dismissal of the case.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Petitioners neglected to take necessary steps to issue notices to respondents, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?