| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1376 - 1380 of 21901

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sooraj Soman regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 579/2022

Kottayam

2025-03-06

approximately-2 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s SREE FINANCIERS vs Sreejith Haridas regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 300/2024

Kottayam District, Kerala

2025-03-07

approximately-5 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Madhu K vs P.P Chandra Babu regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No.662/2017

Kottayam

2025-03-13

approximately-7 years 9 months 13 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Uthup K Thomas vs Jayakumar K et al regarding injunction

Injunction

O.S No. 694/2018

Kottayam

2025-03-13

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jomy Scaria vs Boby Thomas et al regarding restoration petition.

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 300138/2024

Kottayam

2025-03-13

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9649

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to non-payment of batta or other necessary fees for processing their petitions.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove financial means.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Many cases were dismissed as plaintiffs did not take required actions such as issuing notices or attending court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Several cases were dismissed because the petitioners failed to appear for hearings or court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?