| Niyamam AI

Displaying 426 - 430 of 21845

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ramachandran vs Sreejith regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 174/2021

Kollam

2025-05-30

approximately-4 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kannan et al vs Ajith Kumar regarding injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 292/2022

Kollam

2025-05-30

approximately-3 years 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Radhakrishna Pillai vs Binu regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 779/2024

Kollam

2025-05-30

approximately-8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between KPB Nidhi Limited vs Ambili et al regarding claim petition for recovery of loan amount

Claim Petition

OS. 207/2018

Kollam

2025-05-31

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Thrivikrama Panicker regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 967/2023

Kollam

2025-06-04

approximately-6 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9623

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Petitioner failed to pay the necessary fees (batta), leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioner did not appear in court, resulting in dismissal for default.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Lack of required procedural steps, such as issuing notices, resulted in case dismissal.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?