| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3426 - 3430 of 22119

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sunilkumar. K.V vs Rajeev kumar et al regarding temporary injunction

Injunction

OS.1091/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Canara Bank vs Thankarajan A regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S.No106/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-24

approximately-7 months 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.P.Sanilkumar vs Kerala State et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.273/2017

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-24

approximately-8 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gopakumar.S vs Reshmi Vasanthakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1609/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-25

approximately-8 months

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Mookambika Juice Palace regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1624/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-06-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9755

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs often failed to pay necessary fees, such as batta or notice issuance costs, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to demonstrate respondent's means to pay decrees was a common reason for dismissal.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs frequently did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or appearing in court.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed simply due to the absence of the petitioner during hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?