| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2781 - 2785 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Harihara Suthan et al vs S.Ayyan Perumal regarding possession of property

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P.No 115/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-12-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Sandhya Satheesh et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1142/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-02

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Santha vs Kala regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.1599/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-03

approximately-1 year 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Abdul Vahab.E et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.1898/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-03

approximately-9 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hima vs Binu.K.S regarding mediation and settlement

Civil Suit

OS. No.1708/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-03

approximately-2 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs often failed due to non-payment of necessary batta fees for processing their petitions.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or establish necessary facts.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking necessary procedural steps for the continuity of their cases.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

No Representation in Court

Plaintiffs' absence from court proceedings led to dismissals in numerous cases, highlighting lack of engagement.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Required Steps

No Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?