| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2186 - 2190 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Canara Bank vs Mathew.P.J regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 156/2024

Kozhikode

2025-03-28

approximately-9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.P. Sreemathy vs K.P. Sumitra et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 65/2019

Kozhikode

2025-03-28

approximately-5 years 7 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Madhavi et al vs Ragini et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 141/2018

Kozhikode

2025-03-28

approximately-7 years 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between A.J.Robert vs Lawrence et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 872/2015

Kozhikode

2025-03-29

approximately-9 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Rajagopalan Nair et al vs Kamalam et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 182/2005

Kozhikode

2025-03-29

approximately-19 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta for processing their cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

Numerous cases were dismissed due to the absence of plaintiffs or their legal representatives during hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence Provided

A common reason for dismissal was the plaintiffs' failure to present adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Several petitions were dismissed due to a lack of evidence showing that necessary notices were issued to respondents.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation in Court

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?