| Niyamam AI

Displaying 19571 - 19575 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muhammed Haji et al vs Deputy Tahsildar et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No.39 OF 20 15

Tirur

2018-10-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Afsal vs Muhammed Yasin et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 206 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-10-17

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Shahina et al vs The Executive Engineer et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No.195 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-10-17

2 years and 5 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Sreeramani Amma vs Kavil Janaki Amma's Children regarding Injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 236 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-10-11

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunhalankutty vs Salih regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 157 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-10-10

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many petitions were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings or proceedings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Necessary Evidence

Dismissals often occurred due to insufficient evidence demonstrating respondents' financial means or other critical factors.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Numerous cases were dismissed due to the petitioners' failure to issue necessary notices to respondents.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Necessary Evidence

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?