| Niyamam AI

Displaying 19446 - 19450 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between PK Hamsakutty vs Alukal Koya regarding Decree

Execution Proceeding

EP 268/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-12-12

0 years, 4 months, 10 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between PK Hamsakutty vs Alukal Koya regarding Decree

Execution Proceeding

EP 269/2019

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-12-12

0 years 4 months 10 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Fasil vs Ishaq regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. 173/2017

TIRUR

2019-12-12

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Jaleel vs Manager, Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. regarding prohibitory injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 276 OF 2018

2019-12-09

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary Ozhur Service Co-operative Bank vs Thottiyil Basheer et al regarding Loan closing and satisfaction

EP 59/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-12-09

1 year 9 months 11 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence concerning the means to pay or support claims led to many dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Cases

Failure to take necessary procedural steps resulted in case dismissals for many plaintiffs.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Frequent absences of petitioners in court led to dismissals of their cases.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Cases

Non-Representation of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?