| Niyamam AI

Displaying 19321 - 19325 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between secratary vs Muhammed Kutty Machincheri et al regarding EP 445/2018

EP 445/2018

2019-11-28

0 years 11 months 7 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Muhammed Basheer Poozhikkal regarding EP 31/2019

EP 31/2019

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-11-27

0 years, 10 months, 10 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secratry vs Thajudheen Pulikkathodi et al regarding Decree

EP 150/2019

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-11-27

0 years, 7 months, 24 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Thennala Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Muhammad @ Bava et al regarding Decree

Execution Proceedings

EP 158/2018

2019-11-27

1 years 4 months 3 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Sirajuddeen Pulikathodi regarding Default in Representation

EP 196/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-11-27

0 years, 5 months, 21 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

18%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff repeatedly failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating financial capacity or other necessary claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence from court or lack of legal representation.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Dismissals often occurred because plaintiffs did not pursue necessary actions like issuing notices or filing documents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Non-Representation in Court

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?