| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17486 - 17490 of 21912

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between P Raveendran et al vs Kalpaka Builders Private Limited et al regarding mediation agreement

Civil Suit

O.S. No.682/2022

Ernakulam

2025-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Mr. Basil.K.Benny, Mr. Benny K.V regarding settlement in mediation

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 831/2023

Ernakulam

2025-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sebin K Xavier et al vs Dosth Motors et al regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 437/2020

Ernakulam

2025-01-31

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mr. K.K Muhammed Nizar vs Mrs. P.P Kavitha regarding suit rejection

Civil Suit

O.S No. 492/2022

Ernakulam

2025-01-31

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between ICICI Bank Ltd vs Jinu James Kandathil et al regarding a suit under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.549/2022

Ernakulam

2025-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9652

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Numerous petitions were dismissed for failure to pay the required court fees known as batta.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove means to pay debts.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Many petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to take required procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

A significant number of cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff or their representative during court proceedings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?