| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17301 - 17305 of 21989

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Manju Radakrishnan et al vs Hari G regarding compliance with rent control order

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 60/2024

Ernakulam

2025-09-08

approximately-2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of Indian et al vs Stalin P.J regarding a civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 705/2024

Ernakulam

2025-03-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Shobha K D et al vs Dileep K D et al regarding withdrawal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 820 /2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vasu et al vs Yousuf regarding dismissal of suit for default

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 834 /2020

Ernakulam

2025-03-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between MH-10A- Mystic Heights 1 Apartment Owners Association vs Shwas Homes Private Limited et al regarding maintenance of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No . 70/2024

Ernakulam

2025-03-04

approximately-4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9686

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs faced dismissal due to failure to pay required fees or batta for processing their petitions.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence

Petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or establish means.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Dismissing occurrences due to plaintiffs not taking necessary actions like issuing notices or appearing in court.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs failed to appear or provide representation in court.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?