| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17031 - 17035 of 22101

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s. Sacramento Ventures vs Peters Kudumbilan regarding settlement in mediation.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 94/2025

Ernakulam

2025-08-19

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between UCO Bank vs Banisha Babu et al regarding withdrawal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 125/2025

Ernakulam

2025-08-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Reji Joffy vs Sunil Krishnan regarding rent compliance

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 15/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-11

approximately-1 year 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India, RACPC- II, Ernakulam represented by its Manager (SARC), Frederic Jose vs Jibin Jude, Jude O A regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 878 / 2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between T K Alexander Vaidian vs Unit Trust of India et al regarding suit abatement

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1188/2022

Ernakulam

2025-08-21

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9743

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiff failed to present adequate evidence proving the means of respondents to pay the decree debt.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Cases were dismissed for the plaintiff's failure to pay batta for notices or other court proceedings.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

The plaintiff was absent or did not have legal representation, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiff did not take required procedural steps, such as issuing notices or filing necessary documents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation in Court

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?