| Niyamam AI

Displaying 161 - 165 of 21809

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Jose T .V vs Sunoj regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 446/2024

Kollam

2025-09-24

approximately-1 year 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jayakumar vs Gopinathan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1309/2014

Kollam

2025-09-24

approximately-4 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hariharan N et al vs NIL regarding issuance of Succession Certificate

Succession

OP (Succession) No.06/2025

Kollam

2025-09-25

approximately-7 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leela vs Shahini regarding modification of injunction order

Civil Suit

OS.355/2024

Kollam

2025-09-25

approximately-1 year 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between T. Santhosh Kumar vs Sasidharan regarding Partition and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 857/2018

Kollam

2025-09-25

approximately-7 years 20 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to non-payment of required batta fees, leading to automatic dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs often did not provide sufficient evidence to prove their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff in court on scheduled dates.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take necessary steps for issuing notices to defendants, leading to dismissals.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?