| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3396 - 3400 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Madhusoodhanan et al vs Greeshma et al regarding injunction and declaration

Civil Suit

OS. No. 554/2022

Kollam

2025-07-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Canara Bank, Branch at Kundara vs Rejimon.S. regarding decree execution

Execution Petition

EP.No. 173/2023

Kollam

2025-07-29

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Aravindakshan Pillai vs Tomy Joseph regarding review of an order

Civil Suit

RP. No. 194/2023

Kollam

2025-07-30

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thampan et al vs Panchaman regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 173/2019

Kollam District

2025-07-29

approximately-6 years 0 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Murukan vs Liyoni Francis et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 332/2025

Kollam

2025-07-29

Dismissed

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

40%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

The plaintiff frequently failed to appear in court or provide representation during hearings, leading to default dismissals.

Found in 40 cases (40%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Evidence

Plaintiffs often did not provide necessary evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Fees or Costs

Multiple cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs' failure to pay required court fees or costs on time.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Default Dismissals for Procedural Issues

Many cases faced dismissal for procedural issues including lack of necessary documents and non-service of notices.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Failure to Produce Evidence

Non-Payment of Fees or Costs

Default Dismissals for Procedural Issues

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?