| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1821 - 1825 of 15104

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Gigo Jose vs Sivaraman regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.354/2019

Ernakulam

2024-03-30

approximately-4 years 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Shinu Gopal vs Prasanna Gopal et al regarding partition and separate possession

Civil Suit

O.S No. 692/2022

Ernakulam

2024-02-06

approximately-5 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Vishnu Raj regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 777 of 2023

Ernakulam

2024-02-06

approximately-3 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bijo Isaac et al vs Mathew Joseph et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1412/2015

Ernakulam

2024-10-30

approximately-9 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vipin et al vs Baby C.M et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 531/2017

Ernakulam

2024-02-09

approximately-6 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8136

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Defendant Absent in Court

Plaintiffs often failed due to their absence during court proceedings, leading to default judgments.

Found in 37 cases (37%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs failed to substantiate claims with necessary evidence, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Documents

Plaintiffs frequently did not provide required documents, impeding their cases from proceeding.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs

Several cases were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to pay necessary court costs or fees.

Found in 11 cases (11%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Defendant Absent in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Produce Documents

Non-Payment of Costs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?