| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13861 - 13865 of 15096

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Thirunavakarasu vs Appu regarding money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 342 OF 2016

2019-03-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Edassery Veeravunni vs Kottakkali Muhammad et al regarding a decree execution.

Execution Petition

EP 210/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-02-07

1 years, 4 months, 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Shahul Hameed regarding enforcement proceedings.

Enforcement Proceedings

EP 308/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-07

0 years, 1 months, 26 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mathoorvalappil Mammi's daughter Fathima vs Ibrahim regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 328 OF 2018

Tirur Taluk

2019-02-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thottivalappil Muhammedkutty vs Paramban Mariyumma et al regarding settlement of decree.

Execution Petition

EP 109/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-02-14

4 years, 10 months, 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8132

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

43%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 43 cases (43%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Inadequate or missing evidence led to dismissals as plaintiffs could not support their claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not paying necessary court fees or costs.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to provide required documentation, compromising their cases significantly.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Payment of Costs

Failure to Produce Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?