| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1356 - 1360 of 15096

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Immunisa Beegum et al vs University of Kerala et al regarding decree of permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No.269/2007

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-09

approximately-4 years 3 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jai Ganesh vs Rajeswari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1590/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-10

approximately-2 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vijayalekha et al vs Rajesh et al regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

OS. No.494/2013

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-10

approximately-11 years 11 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Girijadevi vs R.Somanath regarding temporary injunction

Injunction

OS.No.1006/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-10

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P. Krishnankutty et al vs Aneesh et al regarding settlement of a suit.

Civil Suit

OS. No.1443/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-11

Partial

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8130

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, leading to dismissal of their cases for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Many petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to pay necessary costs or fees mandated by the court.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Evidence

Plaintiffs often did not present adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Cases were frequently dismissed when plaintiffs had no legal representation during the proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Failure to Produce Evidence

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?