| Niyamam AI

Displaying 126 - 130 of 15022

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Akash S et al vs Anandavally regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 826/2023

Kollam

2025-07-21

approximately-2 years 1 month

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Prathibha vs Raju et al regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 516/2022

Kollam

2025-07-23

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hayarunnisa vs Ayoob regarding Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 385/2018

Kollam

2025-07-29

approximately-7 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Nisar vs Shailaja Beegam regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 611/2018

Kollam

2025-07-29

approximately-8 years 11 months 18 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Latha vs Saraswathy regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 584/2022

Kollam

2025-07-30

approximately-3 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8099

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Plaintiffs failed to appear in court, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Evidence

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Costs

Dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs' failure to pay requisite fees or costs as ordered by the court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not having proper legal representation during proceedings.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Failure to Produce Evidence

Non-Payment of Costs

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?