| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1061 - 1065 of 15097

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vilasini vs Manilal et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 194/2022

2025-06-02

approximately-3 years 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shibu vs Ajeesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 158/ 2018

Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-06-02

approximately-6 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between State bank of India vs Sreekumar Assay.S regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP. 8/2022

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram

2025-06-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vijayakumari vs Induslnd Bank regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 453/2024

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-06-04

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sheeba et al vs Sarojini regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 348/2009

Varkala

2025-06-05

approximately-15 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8133

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

The plaintiff's absence during court proceedings led to automatic dismissal of numerous cases.

Found in 37 cases (37%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to submit necessary evidence or documents, which resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Court Costs

Failure to pay required court fees or costs led to dismissal in several instances.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken to Proceed

Plaintiffs frequently did not take necessary steps to advance their cases, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Non-Payment of Court Costs

No Steps Taken to Proceed

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?