| Niyamam AI

Displaying 781 - 785 of 15087

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kammu vs Anitha regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.576/2024

Kozhikode

2025-11-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Smitha vs Lucy et al regarding succession certificate

Succession Certificate

S. O. P. No. 50/2025

Kozhikode

2025-11-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Subhash Chandran regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP No. 164/2023

Kozhikode

2025-12-02

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gireesh Kumar.P.K vs Gireesh.P.K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.776/2022

Kozhikode

2025-12-08

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shibu vs R. Rajagopalakrishnan, M.J. Anandanarayanan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

Original Suit Nos. 353/2024 & 792/2022

Kozhikode

2025-12-09

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8131

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Plaintiff Absence

Plaintiffs were frequently absent during hearings, leading to default judgments.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide necessary evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs

Petitioners did not pay required costs, which led to the dismissal of their suits.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Defendants consistently lacked important documents necessary for their claims, leading to cases being dismissed.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Plaintiff Absence

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Payment of Costs

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?