| Niyamam AI

Displaying 131 - 135 of 495

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between K. Prathap kumar et al vs Sheela regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.1133/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-30

approximately-1 year 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Asokan vs Jaya Babu, Ramesan K K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.15/2018

2023-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sreethu P N vs George P M et al regarding temporary injunction for use of a road.

Civil Suit

O.S.No.51/2022

2023-10-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 545/2024

Ernakulam

2024-12-21

approximately-0 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mokim Ali vs Kochi Municipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 349 / 2024

Ernakulam

2024-10-17

approximately-8 months 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

41%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Multiple cases dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during crucial hearings or trials.

Found in 41 cases (41%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims or ownership.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Default Dismissals

Many suits were dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiff or legal representation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Not Pressed by Counsel

Cases dismissed because the plaintiff's counsel failed to press the case effectively.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Dismissals

Not Pressed by Counsel

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?