| Niyamam AI

Displaying 126 - 130 of 495

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Dr. Yamuna Prasad vs PRS Krishna Apartment and Commercial Space Owners Welfare Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.972/2025

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-10-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M.I. Shanavas Khan vs Ansar.H et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1250/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-08-04

approximately-2 years 1 month 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vinod T vs Biju B regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1144/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-08-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.P.Sanilkumar vs Kerala State et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.273/2017

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-06-24

approximately-8 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C.S.Sudhan vs Abraham Paul et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

OS.No.549/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Frequent dismissal due to plaintiffs failing to appear in court during critical hearings.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claims leading to dismissals.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Default Dismissals for Non-compliance

Cases dismissed due to non-compliance with procedural requirements such as fees or filing documents.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

No Representation by Counsel

Dismissals related to absence of legal representation for plaintiffs during trials.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Dismissals for Non-compliance

No Representation by Counsel

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?