| Niyamam AI

Displaying 401 - 405 of 751

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between David vs Baby, Kunjamma regarding mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.45/2018

2023-07-31

approximately-5 years 1 month 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Saranya Rajesh vs Yesodha Mani @ Manju et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 33 / 2016

2024-09-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leela Chandran et al vs Karthyayaniyamma et al regarding declaration of rights over property

Civil Suit

OS No. 04 / 2018

Kolenchery

2024-12-20

approximately-6 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Alias vs Kerala Kshethra Samrakshana Samithi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, recovery of money and mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS No. 23 / 2016

2024-06-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ammini et al vs Ajitha Sunil et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

OS No. 10 / 2021

2024-05-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

194

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiffs regularly failed to establish ownership over disputed properties, leading to dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Numerous cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence or lack of representation in court.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Adequate Evidence

Many cases were dismissed for insufficient evidence to support claims or establish rights.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Compliance with Procedural Requirements

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs failed to comply with necessary legal or procedural prerequisites.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Lack of Adequate Evidence

Non-Compliance with Procedural Requirements

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?