| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 166 - 170 of 744

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between E. K. Antony vs P.S. Baiju regarding rent control

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 133/2022

Ernakulam

2025-10-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between T.K. Mathew @ Kunjukunju Mathew vs K.A. Bharathan regarding eviction of tenant

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 145/2023

Ernakulam

2025-10-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dr. P.K.Abdul Ghafoor memorial MES Cultural Complex vs Mr.V.A.Haris regarding rent arrears

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 165/2023

ERNAKULAM

2025-10-22

approximately-2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C. K. Jinan et al vs Kabeer regarding rent arrears

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 21/2024

Ernakulam

2025-10-23

approximately-1 year 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aadil Manzur Arampulickal vs George Kurian Arikody regarding eviction

Eviction Petition

R.C.P. No. 167/2024

Ernakulam

2025-10-23

approximately-1 year 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

79%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 744 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 103 cases)
Commission Report (in 97 cases)
Lawyer's Notice (in 94 cases)
Postal receipt (in 79 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 77 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 591
Defendant Won: 126

126

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear, resulting in default dismissals due to lack of representation.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Many cases were dismissed as plaintiffs did not press their petitions or withdrawal leading to dismissals.

Found in 33 cases (33%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence or Grounds

Plaintiffs often could not provide the necessary evidence or grounds to support their claims.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Jurisdiction Issues

Some petitions were dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction on the part of the court to hear the case.

Found in 8 cases (8%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Petition Not Pressed

Lack of Evidence or Grounds

Jurisdiction Issues

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?