| Niyamam AI

Displaying 491 - 495 of 2445

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sree Krishana Bankers vs Binu. M regarding money recovery

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 150/2025

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-2 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Subramanian M vs N.Udayakumar regarding return of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.341/2025

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-3 years 1 month 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s.S.B.Distributors vs Abdul Latheef regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 535/2024

Kozhikode

2025-10-06

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/S UCO Bank vs Ananthu et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 257/2024

Kozhikode

2025-10-06

approximately-3 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Fahad Rahman. P. P regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 22/2024

Kozhikode

2025-10-06

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay batta, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' non-appearance during court proceedings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Plaintiffs often lacked sufficient evidence to demonstrate their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Plaintiffs frequently failed to produce necessary documents, causing their cases to be dismissed.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Failure to Produce Required Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?