| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2056 - 2060 of 2442

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Shihabudheen Poozhithara regarding undisclosed matter

Unknown

EP 61/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-06

0 years, 10 months, 4 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Geetha et al regarding money suit

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 195 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-01-04

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kummalil Muhammed vs Poovvanmadathil Hussain regarding money suit

Money Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 312 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-01-01

10 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between U.V. Pratheeshkumar vs Adiparambil Kunhalavi regarding money

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 152 OF 20 16

Tirur

2017-12-21

1 year

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Balan vs Adiparambil Kunhalavi regarding money suit

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 377 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-12-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Many petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs were not present during hearings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Petitions often failed due to insufficient evidence supporting claims about defendants' means or case validity.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken by Plaintiffs

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs did not take necessary steps to advance their cases.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Submitted

No Steps Taken by Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?