| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1646 - 1650 of 2450

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Joe Mammen regarding Suit For Realization Of Money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 171/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. vs Sri. Arshad regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 604/2020

Ernakulam

2025-08-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1153/2022

Ernakulam

2025-08-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1154/2020

Ernakulam

2025-06-03

5 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 492/2024

Ernakulam

2025-04-07

2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

218

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs failed to present sufficient evidence supporting their claims or proving the means of the defendants.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Petitioners did not pay the required batta resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff

Plaintiffs were absent during hearings, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Cases were dismissed due to lack of representation for the plaintiff during proceedings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?