| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1116 - 1120 of 2454

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between State Bank of India vs Mr. Fahad.M.K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 10/2024

Ernakulam

2024-11-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of India vs Mrs. Anu Priya Prasad et al regarding suit for realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 787/2016

Ernakulam

2024-10-01

approximately-8 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Vijay Kumar P. regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.980/2020

Ernakulam

2024-10-01

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Salinkumar P.P. regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 590/2024

Ernakulam

2024-10-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Prasanna Rajendran vs Rajendra Babu P regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1240/2019

Ernakulam

2024-10-05

approximately-6 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

222

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs regularly failed to pay necessary fees, leading to default and dismissal of cases.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Frequent dismissals occurred due to the plaintiff's failure to appear at hearings or representation.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence

Plaintiffs often did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Many cases were dismissed as plaintiffs or their counsel did not actively pursue the case.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?