| Niyamam AI

Displaying 6 - 10 of 2443

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sujith T.S regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 110/2025

Ernakulam

2026-01-17

approximately-1 year 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Viswanath D. P regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 774/2025

Ernakulam

2026-01-20

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Sreelekshmi.M.B. et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 610/2022

Kollam

2025-11-21

approximately-4 years 5 months 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Canara Bank vs M/s ARC Render regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 889/2024

Kollam

2025-11-21

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Kavitha. V regarding Suit for the realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 978/2022

Kollam

2025-11-22

approximately-5 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

218

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Court Fees

Plaintiffs often failed to produce necessary court fees, resulting in dismissal of their cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were frequently dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to attend hearings or provide representation.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence

Many plaintiffs could not provide sufficient evidence, leading to dismissals for failure to prove their claims.

Found in 45 cases (45%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Repeated defaults in payment of necessary costs (batta) resulted in numerous case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Court Fees

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?