Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 319/2023

Case between Zodiac Advertisers vs A One Milk Products (P) Ltd. et al regarding civil suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-06-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Zodiac Advertisers filed a suit against A One Milk Products (P) Ltd. and its directors regarding a claim. The case was dismissed as not pressed after the defendant paid the full and final claim amount.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the defendant settled the claim. This indicates that the matter was resolved before a formal judgment was needed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the defendant settled the claim. This indicates that the matter was resolved before a formal judgment was needed.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not pursue the case after the defendant made the payment.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff filed not press memo as defendant paid full and final claim amount.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Zodiac Advertisers
Relation
represented by its Managing Partner Johnson V George
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A One Milk Products (P) Ltd.
Relation
represented by M D Varithamby Susheelan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varithamby Susheelan
Relation
W/o Varithamby Susheelan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudha Susheelan
Relation
W/o Varithamby Susheelan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shahul Hameed Moopan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arun TS
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abhijith Hariharan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T A Niyas
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B L Prasanth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sivaji B S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed due to defendant paying full and final claim amount.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff filed not press memo as defendant paid full and final claim amount. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Attachment order in IA 4/23 is lifted.
Evidence:
IA 9/25 is heard allowed (Vide Separate Order). Attachment order in IA 4/23 is lifted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Zodiac Advertisers vs A One Milk Products (P) Ltd. et al regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Zodiac Advertisers vs A One Milk Products (P) Ltd. et al regarding civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won