Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1074/2020

Case between Yusuf et al vs Sabhapathi et al regarding dismissed suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Yusuf, Safeena Afsal, and Nafeesa Yousuf filed a suit against the defendants Sabhapathi and Rajeev. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed by the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were not pressing the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were not pressing the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not press the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not press the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The counsel for the plaintiff submitted that the suit is being not pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Yusuf
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Safeena Afsal
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nafeesa Yousuf
Party Age
73
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shabani V.Y
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sabhapathi
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeev
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joy Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aishwarya Mary Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aparna Somarajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishab K Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vivek V Kannankeri
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for the plaintiff submitted that the suit is being not pressed. Endorsement as to the same made by the counsel for the plaintiff. Hence, suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Yusuf et al vs Sabhapathi et al regarding dismissed suit
Case Code Year
Case between Yusuf et al vs Sabhapathi et al regarding dismissed suit

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won