Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 31/2022

Case between X Ship Design & Analytics Pvt. Ltd. vs Shyam Krishnan et al regarding damages and counter claim for salary arrears

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves X Ship Design & Analytics Pvt. Ltd. suing former employee Shyam Krishnan and his new employer, M/s. MariApp Marine Solutions Pvt Ltd, for damages. The defendants counter-claim for unpaid salary and gratuity.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fee and decreed the counter claim in favor of the first defendant, Shyam Krishnan, directing the plaintiff to pay a specified sum with interest. The defendants are also entitled to costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is directed to pay to the first defendant, an amount of ₹1,01,125/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fee and decreed the counter claim in favor of the first defendant, Shyam Krishnan, directing the plaintiff to pay a specified sum with interest. The defendants are also entitled to costs.
Key Reasoning:
The first defendant proved that the plaintiff owes salary arrears and the evidence favored his claims.
Why Defendant Won:
The first defendant proved that the plaintiff owes salary arrears and the evidence favored his claims.
Supporting Evidence
I am of the opinion that the preponderance of probabilities favour the first defendant... the plaintiff has not produced any evidence from its side to establish a case...

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the plaint stands rejected on 7.04.2025 for non payment of balance court fee. The counter claim is decreed...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
X Ship Design & Analytics Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sandith Thandasherry
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shyam Krishnan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. MariApp Marine Solutions Pvt Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Exhibit B1 to B3: Various documents including final settlement statements and letters.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. Sathisan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.S. Amal Dharsan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is directed to pay an amount to the first defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the plaint stands rejected on 7.04.2025 for non payment of balance court fee. The counter claim is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is directed to pay to the first defendant, an amount of ₹1,01,125/- (Rupees one lakh one thousand one hundred and twenty five only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from 01.07.2023, till its realisation from the plaintiff or from assets of plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are entitled to the costs of the suit and counterclaim from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the defendants are entitled to the costs of the suit and counterclaim from the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Final Settlement Statement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The final settlement statement issued by the plaintiff was used as evidence regarding the payment dispute.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Letter from Navagathi
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This letter was submitted as evidence related to the counter claim presented by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Letter from X-ship
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document supported the claims made by the first defendant in the counter claim.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Order by Deputy Labour Commissioner
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The order directed the plaintiff to pay a certain amount to the first defendant and was referenced during proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.B4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between X Ship Design & Analytics Pvt. Ltd. vs Shyam Krishnan et al regarding damages and counter claim for salary arrears
Case Code Year
Case between X Ship Design & Analytics Pvt. Ltd. vs Shyam Krishnan et al regarding damages and counter claim for salary arrears

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won