Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 31/2022

Case between X Ship Design & Analytics Pvt. Ltd. vs Shyam Krishnan et al regarding damages and counter claim for salary arrears

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves X Ship Design & Analytics Pvt. Ltd. suing former employee Shyam Krishnan and his new employer, M/s. MariApp Marine Solutions Pvt Ltd, for damages. The defendants counter-claim for unpaid salary and gratuity.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fee and decreed the counter claim in favor of the first defendant, Shyam Krishnan, directing the plaintiff to pay a specified sum with interest. The defendants are also entitled to costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is directed to pay to the first defendant, an amount of ₹1,01,125/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The first defendant proved that the plaintiff owes salary arrears and the evidence favored his claims.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the plaint stands rejected on 7.04.2025 for non payment of balance court fee. The counter claim is decreed...

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

X Ship Design & Analytics Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) 2ⁿᵈ Floor, Building No. 298/B2, New Ward No. 24, University Road, CUSAT P.O, South Kalamassery, Kochi - 682 002 Sandith Thandasherry (44 years)

Defendants

Shyam Krishnan (Age not specified years) Kalarickel Puthenpurayil, Maruthoorvattom P.O, Cherthala, Alappuzha - 688 524 M/s. MariApp Marine Solutions Pvt Ltd (Age not specified years) MariApp House, Plot No. A2 - 09, Smart City Kochi SEZ, Kakkanad, Ernakulam - 682 0242

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is directed to pay an amount to the first defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the plaint stands rejected on 7.04.2025 for non payment of balance court fee. The counter claim is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is directed to pay to the first defendant, an amount of ₹1,01,125/- (Rupees one lakh one thousand one hundred and twenty five only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from 01.07.2023, till its realisation from the plaintiff or from assets of plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are entitled to the costs of the suit and counterclaim from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the defendants are entitled to the costs of the suit and counterclaim from the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Final Settlement Statement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The final settlement statement issued by the plaintiff was used as evidence regarding the payment dispute.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Letter from Navagathi
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This letter was submitted as evidence related to the counter claim presented by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Letter from X-ship
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document supported the claims made by the first defendant in the counter claim.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Order by Deputy Labour Commissioner
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The order directed the plaintiff to pay a certain amount to the first defendant and was referenced during proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.B4

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases